Labels:book | bulletin board | poster | reckoner | sky OCR: 15 Ct. 866, 55 L. Ed. 2d 40 (1978): In Re Execuair Corp. 125 B.R. 600, 602 -03 604 (Bk. C.D. Cal. 1991); SEE alsa Dewsnup v. Timm, Supra. If any Congressional intent texists with respect to determining "reasonable equivalent value" under lUs 548(a)(2}(} litis that Congress has not intended to overrule Madrid 9th BAP any other decision. In effect. Congress intent is obviously to leave such determinations to the various Courts of Appeal, which should apply state forec] losure laws at least in part. It should also be clear that Congress has not prohibited consideration of nor pre empted, the laws the states forecl losure 10 real property any determination as to "reasonableequivalent vajue" This Supreme Court should not substitute impose any other intent E the making of such determinations Pet ...
(.png)
